Electrochemical fuels

Electrochemical fuels

Carbon-based fuels make up the backbone of today's energy infrastructure and have unparalleled energy efficiency. If an efficient (photo-)electrochemical route to producing carbon-based fuels from CO2 can be developed, then a range of new primary energy options, including solar, wind, geothermal, hydro, and nuclear, will be capable of providing hydrocarbon fuels for our future energy infrastructure. To enable the production of hydrocarbons in an electrochemical cell, the development of an efficient electrocatalyst to serve as the cathode is paramount. In the 1980s, copper was identified as a unique electrocatalyst material for its ability to produce hydrocarbons and alcohols with a faradaic selectivity in excess of 60%; however, the overpotential on copper electrodes is around 1 V. Since then, no other metal electrocatalysts have been found with selectivity as high as that of copper. The mechanism for how copper carries out this selective reduction, as well as the reason for the overpotential, have remained elusive. We are using density functional theory (DFT) to understand the reactivity and selectivity of the copper catalyst, and are using this knowledge to develop design principles that may enable more efficient electrocatalysts to be developed. The figure shows the elementary pathway that we have identified for this process, along with the corresponding free energetics of each elementary step as calculated with DFT. CO2 is first reduced by a proton-electron pair to form carboxy (COOH*), an adsorbate that bonds to the Cu electrocatalyst. (An asterisk, *, indicates a surface-adsorbed species.) The carboxy is then reduced to form CO*, liberating H2O in the process. In the potential-limiting step, CO* is protonated resulting in formyl (CHO*). This step is the most difficult from an energetic standpoint and determines the voltage requirements of the overall process. The formyl is further protonated to formaldehyde (CH2O*) and methoxy (CH3O*) before methane (CH4) is liberated, breaking the second C-O bond. This leaves O on the surface, which is cleared as water. Using the findings of this proposed mechanism, we are studying the energetics of CO2 reduction on other metal electrocatalyst surfaces in order to understand trends in CO2 reduction from first principles. We are using the design principles that we are developing to search for candidate materials that can perform the electroreduction of CO2 with higher efficiency than Cu without sacrificing selectivity. As candidate materials are developed using computational tools, we will work with experimental collaborators to test these materials for their activity in CO2 reduction.

Publications

Displaying 41 - 60 of 136

J.H. Montoya, L.C. Seitz, P. Chakthranont, A. Vojvodic, T.F. Jaramillo, J.K. Nørskov. Nature Materials, 16, 70-81. 2017.

Aayush R. Singh, Brian A Rohr, J. A. Schwalbe, Matteo Cargnello, Karen Chan, Thomas F. Jaramillo, Ib Chorkendorff, Jens. K. Nørskov. ACS Catalysis, 7, 706-709. 2017.

Toru Hatsukade, Kendra P. Kuhl, Etosha R. Cave, David N. Abram, Jeremy T. Feaster, Anna L. Jongerius, Christopher Hahn, Thomas F. Jaramillo. Energy Technology, 5, 955-961. 2017.

Andrew D. Doyle, Michal Bajdich, Aleksandra Vojvodic. Catalysis Letters, 147. 2017.

Zhiyi Lu, Guangxu Chen, Yanbin Li, Haotian Wang, Jin Xie, Lei Liao, Chong Liu, Yayuan Liu, Tong Wu, Yuzhang Li, Alan C. Luntz, Michal Bajdich, Yi Cui. Journal of American Chemical Society. 2017.

Xinyan Liu, Jianping Xiao, Hongjie Peng, Xin Hong, Karen Chan, Jens K. Nørskov. Nature communications. 2017.

Dohyung Kim, Chenlu Xie, Nigel Becknell, Yi Yu, Mohammadreza Karamad, Karen Chan, Ethan J Crumlin, Jens K Norskov, Peidong Yang. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2017.

Christopher Hahn, Toru Hatsukade, Youn-Geun Kim, Arturas Vailionis, Jack H. Baricuatro, Drew C. Higgins, Stephanie A. Nitopi, Manuel P. Soriaga, Thomas F. Jaramillo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, 5918-5923. 2017.

Jeremy Feaster, Anna Jongerius, Xinyan Liu, Makoto Urushihara, Stephanie A. Nitopi, Christopher Hahn, Karen Chan, Jens K. Nørskov, Thomas F. Jaramillo. Langmuir. 2017.

Joaquin Resasco, Leanne D. Chen, Ezra Clark, Charlie Tsai, Christopher Hahn, Thomas Jaramillo, Karen Chan, Alexis Bell. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 139, 11277-11287. 2017.

Zachary Ulissi, Michael Tang, Jianping Xiao, Xinyan Liu, Daniel A Torelli, Mohammadreza Karamad, Kyle Cummins, Christopher Hahn, Nathan S Lewis, Thomas F Jaramillo, Karen Chan, Jens K Norskov. ACS Catalysis, 7, 6600. 2017.

Ezra L. Clark, Christopher Hahn, Thomas F. Jaramillo, Alexis T. Bell. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2017.

Kun Jiang, Robert B Sandberg, Austin J Akey, Xinyan Liu, David C Bell, Jens K Nørskov, Karen Chan, Haotian Wang. Nature Catalysis, 1, 111-119. 2018.

Etosha R. Cave, Chuan Shi, Kendra P. Kuhl, Toru Hatsukade, David N. Abram, Christopher Hahn, Karen Chan, Thomas F. Jaramillo. ACS Catalysis, 8, 3035-3040. 2018.

Charlotte Kirk, Leanne D. Chen, Samira Siahrostami, Mohammadreza Karamad, Michal Bajdich, Johannes Voss, Jens K. Nørskov, Karen Chan. ACS Central Science, 3, 1286-1293. 2017.

Aayush Singh, Joseph H. Montoya, Brian Andrew Rohr, Charlie Tsai , Aleksandra Vojvodic, Jens K. Nørskov. ACS Catalysis, 8, 4017-4024. 2018.

Shaama Mallikarjun Sharada, Aayush Singh, Brian Andrew Rohr, Yanjing Su, Lijie Qiao, Jens K. Nørskov. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 20, 4982. 2018.

Alan T. Landers, Meredith Fields, Daniel A. Torelli, Jianping Xiao, Thomas R. Hellstern, Sonja A. Francis, Charlie Tsai, Jakob Kibsgaard, Nathan S. Lewis, Karen Chan, Christopher Hahn, Thomas F. Jaramillo. ACS Energy Letters, 3, 1450-1457. 2018.

Michael Tang, Zachary Ulissi, Karen Chan. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 122, 14481-14487. 2018.

Meredith Fields, Xin Hong, Jens K Nørskov, Karen Chan. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 122, 16209-16215. 2018.